Search for: All records

Abstract The Biorepository and Integrative Genomics (BIG) Initiative in Tennessee has developed a pioneering resource to address gaps in genomic research by linking genomic, phenotypic, and environmental data from a diverse Mid-South population, including underrepresented groups. We analyzed 13,152 exomes from BIG and found significant genetic diversity, with 50% of participants inferred to have non-European or several types of admixed ancestry. Ancestry within the BIG cohort is stratified, with distinct geographic and demographic patterns, as African ancestry is more common in urban areas, while European ancestry is more common in suburban regions. We observe ancestry-specific rates of novel genetic variants, which are enriched for functional or clinical relevance. Disease prevalence analysis linked ancestry and environmental factors, showing higher odds ratios for asthma and obesity in minority groups, particularly in the urban area. Finally, we observe discrepancies between self-reported race and genetic ancestry, with related individuals self-identifying in differing racial categories. These findings underscore the limitations of race as a biomedical variable. BIG has proven to be an effective model for community-centered precision medicine. We integrated genomics education, and fostered great trust among the contributing communities. Future goals include cohort expansion, and enhanced genomic analysis, to ensure equitable healthcare outcomes. 

Biobanks linked to electronic health records provide rich resources for health‐related research. With improvements in administrative and informatics infrastructure, the availability and utility of data from biobanks have dramatically increased. In this paper, we first aim to characterize the current landscape of available biobanks and to describe specific biobanks, including their place of origin, size, and data types. The development and accessibility of large‐scale biorepositories provide the opportunity to accelerate agnostic searches, expedite discoveries, and conduct hypothesis‐generating studies of disease‐treatment, disease‐exposure, and disease‐gene associations. Rather than designing and implementing a single study focused on a few targeted hypotheses, researchers can potentially use biobanks' existing resources to answer an expanded selection of exploratory questions as quickly as they can analyze them. However, there are many obvious and subtle challenges with the design and analysis of biobank‐based studies. Our second aim is to discuss statistical issues related to biobank research such as study design, sampling strategy, phenotype identification, and missing data. We focus our discussion on biobanks that are linked to electronic health records. Some of the analytic issues are illustrated using data from the Michigan Genomics Initiative and UK Biobank, two biobanks with two different recruitment mechanisms. We summarize the current body of literature for addressing these challenges and discuss some standing open problems. This work complements and extends recent reviews about biobank‐based research and serves as a resource catalog with analytical and practical guidance for statisticians, epidemiologists, and other medical researchers pursuing research using biobanks.